Two snapshots in the TAKE example
TAKEUSDT alert #1 lists 24h turnover $1.8M; alert #2 lists $2.7M. Both are rolling-24h snapshots at card time, not the sum of trades across the 83 seconds between alerts.
The $0.9M arithmetic difference is not a $0.9M inflow and does not prove a large-participant purchase. Turnover describes trading activity within a time window, not the direction of money flow.
Reading the figures in context
There is no candle volume, open interest, or order book in the supplied materials. Without them you cannot reconstruct flow structure or treat a turnover delta as a “whale entry”.